Constructs of space, these intricacies of immediacy and the ways in which timing could trick the senses. The aspects of difference or defense in natural responses, these indicative measures of potential and possibility in the distinctions of motion or the wanted perfections of attachment. The connectivity and continuance of any amount of data or information in the wanted possibility beyond sense, the ways in which imagination automatically compensates for space and the closures of closeness decided with no options for refusal. The space imagined for the imaginal and the facts of supposed homeland or belonging for imaginary, the loopholes left by Stephen Hawkins and the ease of misinterpretation of commons or shared space or timing. Beyond imaginary, beyond sense, beyond collective: instinct and imagination in possibilities of distinctions which could work or make sense in any amount of ambiguity. Divinations of immediacy in that which seems as though applicable or useful, as though it could be attached or real as part of other movement or timing, the wanted figures of decision taken by immediacy and assumption, and the necessity in free will. I don't need free will to be against epistemic normativity, and removal from free choice will never disprove free will. Excitability in variance, the ways in which instinct and imagination condition sense to environment and the ways in which entertainment has tricked our senses with imagination. The wanted distinctions of measurement in that which is personal choice, the oblivion of obviousness and the ways in which conditioned and repetitive space more easily tricks reference or record. The variance and parable in underlying principle, the figured unrest and limits of interpretive space, these variability patterns never having actual constant, the dendritic forms of life morphing from space or void, and assumptions upon nothing which are unfair at best. Decidable absolutions of uncertainty and the need for free thought, these confiscations of daylight and the fever dreams of variability in attachment or use, the constant inconsistencies of space and timing which cannot be applied nor used effectively and the inevitable volatility of indeterminable data. The wanted figures of perfection in constant or the supposed use of only wrongness and the inability to err, whether in assumptions of only corrected or only false information, error exists whether its recognized as part of a 'universal system' or not. Mathematics is not a system, but a natural science, no system in nature nor beyond can be perfect, and the variability of applicability in that which is undecidable and has no real constants creates volatility that doesn't belong in a natural system. Random and chaotic variance in possibility and the ways in which any amount of motion or emotion could be taken into or out of any amount of situation depending on character and figures choice and movement. The consistencies of variability and the actuality of error in nature, the wanted naming and claiming of natural event to error or mistake: accident and coincidence aint necessarily error. Living water in the air we breathe, the breaking apart of daylight to scales we could tolerate in sight and the ways in which the mind compensates for space and timing. Fluidity in motion and the wanted sightliness of timing, these scales broken apart to portions of decision and indeterminable senses for error or mistake, for the possibilities in coincident and accident beyond supposed error to unnatural systems. Underlying commonalities in chemical and electrical actions and reactions do not equal function, nor cause meaning nor reason. The variability in an assumptive constant, the idea of zero or the wanted uses of water, the conditioned multiplicative values of any amount of space and that which is underlying any chemical or electrical conversion or movement. The university-ality of any amount of supposedly applicable data and the distinctions in space and timing of imagination, the wild random and chaotic variance and volatility in change and distinctions of supposed constant. Assume we already know, how will we ever figure it out? Underlying principle in science, and the necessity in parable over the ease of mythological underpinnings of absolution and the convenience in supposing we already know. The narrative indicatives of allowance and the need for rhetorical situation and parable, the imagined connectivity or continuances of data and information and the ways in which imagined motion and timing easily trick record and reference.